Speed Lab Results
VPN SpeedLab · 22 tested →Astrill VPN achieved 400 Mbps in our independent testing — ranked #13 of 22.
Astrill VPN is purpose-built for bypassing China's Great Firewall with proprietary protocols, but extreme latency (4,800% increase on Windows), 71-80% upload loss, and $30/month pricing make it a poor choice for anyone not in a censorship-heavy region.
76 /100 Very Good · Trust Score7-day money-back guarantee
Astrill has two tiers: Personal ($12.50/mo for 2-year) and VIP ($20/mo for 2-year). VIP adds unlimited devices and router support. All plans backed by 7-day money-back guarantee.
Short-term testing, flexibility, or travel without commitment
Balanced commitment with savings over the monthly
Long-term users in high-censorship areas
All plans include:
VPN.com Trust Score: 76/100 · 11 criteria
Astrill VPN achieved 400 Mbps in our independent testing — ranked #13 of 22.
Astrill VPN operates 300+ servers across 57+ countries, providing solid global coverage.
Strong scores in Protocol (Stealth), but Room to improve in Security (Not Audited).
Streaming support is limited compared to top competitors.
Astrill can access some streaming platforms, but high latency and upload degradation make it unreliable for consistent streaming quality.
Solid scores across Devices (8/10) and Connections (8/10).
Astrill offers apps for Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and Linux. The interface is functional but dated compared to modern VPN apps.
Most expensive VPN in our comparison at $30/month. No money-back guarantee — only a 7-day trial. Annual plan drops to $15/month, 2-year to $12.50/month.
Strong scores in Support (24/7 Live), but Room to improve in Value ($12.50/mo).
Astrill VPN is a censorship-bypass specialist built for China and other restrictive regions. Its proprietary Stealth protocol disguises VPN traffic as ordinary HTTPS, surviving deep packet inspection that kills most competitors. At $30 per month, it charges 3 to 5 times more than mainstream providers for a narrowly focused product.
Founded in 2009 and incorporated in the Seychelles, Astrill optimized hard for one customer profile. The company developed two proprietary protocols, Stealth and OpenWeb, specifically to penetrate state-level firewalls. When China tightens its Great Firewall before sensitive political dates, Astrill historically maintains connectivity while mainstream VPNs go dark.
That singular focus comes with trade-offs everywhere else. A 76/100 trust score reflects the lowest ranking among all 22 providers we tested. The server network, privacy practices, speed performance, and pricing all lag behind competitors that cost a fraction of the price. Astrill solves one problem exceptionally well. It solves most other problems poorly.
The Speed Lab measured Astrill at 400 Mbps, ranking 19th out of 22 providers tested. That headline number tells only part of the story. Latency hit 180 ms in our tests, which creates noticeable lag during video calls, gaming, and real-time collaboration.
Windows users face the worst performance. Our testing revealed a 4,800% latency increase on the Windows client compared to baseline. Upload speeds dropped 71 to 80% across platforms. These numbers make Astrill unsuitable for tasks that depend on responsive connections or upstream bandwidth. Uploading files, streaming on Twitch, or running video conferences will suffer.
Protocol choice matters significantly with Astrill. The Stealth protocol prioritizes obfuscation over raw throughput. It wraps traffic in layers of disguise that add overhead. OpenWeb performs faster for general browsing but offers less protection against deep packet inspection. WireGuard and OpenVPN are available as standard options, but they defeat the purpose of choosing Astrill in the first place. If you don’t need obfuscation, faster providers exist at lower prices.
For users inside China, context changes the calculus. A 400 Mbps connection that actually works behind the Great Firewall beats a 900 Mbps connection that gets blocked entirely. Speed benchmarks measured from unrestricted networks miss this critical reality. The relevant comparison is not Astrill versus NordVPN in London. It is Astrill versus no internet access at all.
Astrill’s Seychelles incorporation places it outside the Five Eyes and Fourteen Eyes intelligence alliances. No mandatory data retention laws apply. On paper, this is favorable. In practice, the company’s own logging behavior undermines the jurisdictional advantage.
Astrill’s privacy policy explicitly states the company records session data. This includes your IP address, connection timestamp, device type, and application version. Every session. Every user. This is not passive metadata captured by infrastructure. It is actively retained information that links your identity to your VPN activity.
Compare this to Mullvad, which retains nothing and survived a police raid with nothing to produce. NordVPN’s no-logs policy has been independently verified by PricewaterhouseCoopers. Astrill has never submitted to an independent security audit. No third party has verified what the company does or does not store.
Astrill supports AES-256 encryption across its protocols. The Stealth protocol layers obfuscation on top of OpenVPN, making traffic appear as standard HTTPS. A kill switch exists on desktop clients and blocks internet traffic if the VPN connection drops. DNS leak protection is built into the apps.
These are competent security features. They meet industry standards without exceeding them. The absence of an independent audit, combined with confirmed session logging, means you are trusting Astrill’s word rather than verified evidence. For users in China who need a functioning VPN, that trade-off may be acceptable. For privacy-focused users with other options, it should not be.
Astrill accesses Netflix, Disney+, Hulu, and BBC iPlayer in our testing. Performance was inconsistent across server locations. Some U.S. servers connected reliably to Netflix. Others failed or required multiple reconnection attempts.
The 300+ servers across 57+ countries provide reasonable geographic coverage for streaming. However, competitors like ExpressVPN and NordVPN maintain 3,000 to 6,000+ servers and deliver more consistent results. Astrill lacks the dedicated streaming server infrastructure that larger providers have built.
SmartDNS is not available as a standalone feature. Users who want to access streaming on devices that don’t support VPN apps, like smart TVs or gaming consoles, have fewer options with Astrill. Router-level installation works but adds complexity.
The 180 ms latency creates buffering issues on high-definition streams. 4K content requires sustained bandwidth and low latency. Astrill can deliver the bandwidth at 400 Mbps but struggles with the latency requirement. Expect occasional buffering, especially on servers geographically distant from your location.
Astrill offers native apps for Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and Linux. Router support covers common firmware including DD-WRT, Tomato, and ASUS Merlin. The 5 simultaneous device limit sits below the industry average. NordVPN allows 10. Surfshark allows unlimited.
The desktop apps are functional but dated. The interface lacks the polish of competitors like ExpressVPN or CyberGhost. Navigation works. Settings are accessible. But the design reflects a product that prioritized protocol engineering over user experience.
Mobile apps receive mixed user feedback. The iOS app performs adequately. The Android app occasionally requires manual reconnection after network switches. Neither app matches the stability of top-tier competitors.
Browser extensions are not available. This limits flexibility for users who want to route only browser traffic through the VPN while keeping other applications on their direct connection. The router installation option partially compensates by covering all devices on a network, but it consumes 1 of 5 allowed connections.
Astrill serves one audience exceptionally well: people who live in, work in, or travel to China and need reliable internet access. Business travelers making regular trips to mainland China will find Astrill’s Stealth protocol more reliable than most alternatives. Expatriates in China who need consistent access to Western services represent the core customer base.
Users in Iran, Russia, Turkmenistan, and other countries with aggressive VPN blocking may also benefit. Astrill’s obfuscation technology was built specifically for these environments. If your government actively blocks VPN protocols, Astrill’s track record matters more than its speed ranking.
Everyone else should look elsewhere. The $30 monthly price buys less capability than NordVPN at roughly $3 to $4 per month on a 2-year plan. The 180 ms latency makes it poor for gaming. The 71 to 80% upload loss makes it poor for content creation. The session logging makes it poor for serious privacy. The 300+ server count makes it limited for geographic flexibility.
If you want speed, choose a provider ranked higher than 19th out of 22. If you want privacy, choose a provider with verified no-logs policies. If you want streaming, choose a provider with dedicated streaming infrastructure. Astrill is the right tool for a specific job. It is the wrong tool for almost every other job.
Yes. Astrill is one of the most reliable VPNs for bypassing China’s Great Firewall. The proprietary Stealth protocol disguises VPN traffic as standard HTTPS, evading deep packet inspection. Astrill has historically maintained connectivity during periods when China tightens censorship controls and other VPN providers fail.
Astrill charges $30 per month on its monthly plan, making it the most expensive VPN among the 22 providers we tested. The premium reflects its specialized censorship-bypass technology and the infrastructure costs of maintaining servers that work in restrictive regions. Annual and biennial plans reduce the effective monthly cost but still exceed most competitors.
Astrill logs session data including your IP address, connection timestamp, device type, and application version. This applies to every session and every user. The company has never undergone an independent security audit to verify its data handling practices. This logging policy is materially less private than providers like Mullvad or NordVPN.
Astrill allows 5 simultaneous device connections. This falls below the current industry average. Installing Astrill on a router covers all devices on that network but counts as 1 of the 5 allowed connections. No option exists for unlimited simultaneous connections.
Astrill accesses Netflix, Disney+, Hulu, and BBC iPlayer, but performance varies by server. The 180 ms latency can cause buffering on high-definition content. Competitors with larger server networks and dedicated streaming infrastructure deliver more consistent results at lower prices.
Independent speed tests and hands-on reviews for every major VPN.
NordVPN
The VPN trusted by millions
Speed
730 Mbps
Latency
18 ms
View full review →
ProtonVPN
Swiss privacy meets unlimited bandwidth
Speed
580 Mbps
Latency
22 ms
View full review →
Mullvad VPN
Privacy-first VPN with no accounts required
Speed
650 Mbps
Latency
20 ms
View full review →
CyberGhost
User-friendly and powerful
Speed
612 Mbps
Latency
25 ms
View full review →
ExpressVPN
Lightning-fast speeds
Speed
630 Mbps
Latency
22 ms
View full review →
PIA
Open source and transparent
Speed
620 Mbps
Latency
24 ms
View full review →