Speed Lab Results
VPN SpeedLab · 22 tested →CyberGhost achieved 612 Mbps in our independent testing — ranked #4 of 22. Latency of 25 ms makes it excellent for gaming and video calls.
CyberGhost consistently delivers top-tier performance for demanding tasks like 4K streaming, large file transfers, and competitive gaming.
85 /100 Excellent · Trust Score45-day money-back guarantee
CyberGhost offers multiple pricing tiers and plan durations. Longer commitments typically offer bigger discounts. All plans backed by 45-day money-back guarantee.
Short-term use, testing the service, or flexibility without commitment
Medium-term commitment with better value than a monthly commitment
Long-term users wanting maximum savings, streaming, privacy, multi-device protection, and extras like dedicated IP or bundled security
All plans include:
VPN.com Trust Score: 85/100 · 11 criteria
CyberGhost achieved 612 Mbps in our independent testing — ranked #4 of 22. Latency of 25 ms makes it excellent for gaming and video calls.
One of the largest VPN networks globally with 11,500+ servers in 100 countries. CyberGhost offers extensive coverage and specialty servers for P2P, streaming, and obfuscation.
CyberGhost excels across the board here, scoring 5/5 for Security and 9/10 for Protocol.
CyberGhost VPN uses industry-standard security protocols to ensure everyday privacy and protect users' data online.
CyberGhost unblocks 7+ Services, though performance varies by region.
CyberGhost uses dedicated, optimized streaming servers to reliably unblock geo-restricted content without extra settings.
CyberGhost excels across the board here, scoring 10/10 for Devices and 9/10 for Connections.
CyberGhost is built for simplicity and gets users protected quickly without requiring technical knowledge.
No technical expertise required. If you can install regular software, you can set up CyberGhost. Advanced users have granular control when needed.
Strong scores in Money-Back (45 days), Support (24/7 Live).
CyberGhost has a single statistic that tends to stop people mid-scroll: 11,500+ servers across 100 countries. That’s not a rounding error — it’s the largest server network in the consumer VPN market by a significant margin. But raw server count is a marketing number until you understand what’s behind it, and what’s behind CyberGhost is a more interesting story than the headline suggests.
Founded in Romania and now owned by Kape Technologies — the same holding company behind ExpressVPN and Private Internet Access — CyberGhost navigates a tension that every serious buyer should understand. Its NoSpy servers are physically owned and operated in Romania, giving privacy advocates something genuinely meaningful. Its Kape ownership raises questions that, in fairness, it shares with two of the most popular VPN brands on the market.
CyberGhost earns an 85/100 — strong technical execution, an industry-leading 45-day money-back guarantee, and a server network that gives users geographic flexibility no competitor can match, against a background of shared corporate ownership that deserves honest scrutiny.
CyberGhost was founded in Bucharest, Romania in 2011. For its first few years it operated as an independent company with a privacy-forward focus, headquartered in a country with relatively strong data protection laws and outside the Five Eyes and Fourteen Eyes surveillance alliances. Romania’s legal framework does not mandate data retention in the same ways that UK or US law requires, which made it a credible jurisdiction choice from the outset.
In 2017, Kape Technologies — then known as Crossrider — acquired CyberGhost. This acquisition set off a years-long consolidation: Kape subsequently acquired Private Internet Access (2019) and ExpressVPN (2021), assembling a portfolio of high-profile consumer VPN brands under a single holding company. The combined subscriber base across Kape’s properties is estimated at over 7 million paying users, though CyberGhost alone claims 38 million registered users.
The Kape concern is the same one documented in our ExpressVPN review: Kape’s predecessor company, Crossrider, operated a software platform associated with adware distribution and potentially unwanted programs. Kape rebranded and pivoted into privacy products in 2018. Critics argue that the cultural distance from that history isn’t sufficient for a company now managing VPN infrastructure for tens of millions of users.
“The Kape question isn’t whether you believe the audits — it’s whether you’re comfortable with a single holding company controlling so much VPN infrastructure. That’s a structural concern, not a technical one.”
CyberGhost’s response to this concern is more concrete than most: the company maintains its Romanian headquarters, continues to publish detailed transparency reports on a quarterly basis, and operates the NoSpy server program — physical hardware owned by CyberGhost, housed in its own data center in Romania, managed entirely by CyberGhost staff with no third-party colocation arrangement. It’s a meaningful structural mitigation for users whose concern is data center access rather than corporate ownership.
CyberGhost’s NoSpy servers are the most distinctive privacy feature in its product lineup. Most VPN providers rent server space from third-party data centers — which means a third party has physical access to the hardware, even if the provider argues no useful data is ever on the drives. NoSpy eliminates that dependency.
The NoSpy data center in Romania is owned and operated by CyberGhost. Staff who manage the hardware are CyberGhost employees. The servers are not colocated with other tenants. The legal jurisdiction is Romanian, with its comparatively favorable data protection framework.
Practically, this means that a government seeking data from a NoSpy server would need to pursue CyberGhost in Romanian courts — not lean on a third-party hosting provider who might be operating under a different jurisdiction. For users with elevated privacy concerns, NoSpy represents a meaningful upgrade over standard server infrastructure.
NoSpy servers are available on the higher-tier plans and may require selecting them explicitly in the app. They are not available in every location — the NoSpy network is smaller than CyberGhost’s full server fleet — but for users who want the extra layer, they’re a genuine differentiator.
CyberGhost publishes transparency reports more frequently than most VPN providers: quarterly rather than annually. These reports include data requests received, served, and refused — broken down by type and jurisdiction. The consistency of this reporting cadence is itself meaningful: it suggests an operational commitment rather than a one-time PR effort.
Independent audits have been conducted by Deloitte, verifying CyberGhost’s no-logs policy. Deloitte is a credible auditor for this purpose, and the scope covers whether user-identifiable data is stored during or after VPN sessions. CyberGhost has committed to annual audit cycles.
CyberGhost’s security stack is solid across all platforms:
WireGuard as the default protocol is the right call in 2026. It’s faster than OpenVPN, its code is small enough to audit meaningfully (roughly 4,000 lines versus OpenVPN’s 100,000+), and its cryptographic choices are modern and well-reviewed. CyberGhost’s WireGuard implementation is standard and functional.
CyberGhost’s no-logs policy covers:
The company does collect aggregated, non-identifiable statistics for infrastructure planning — a standard practice. This data is not linked to individual users or sessions. The Deloitte audit verified this architecture is implemented as described.
CyberGhost ranked 10th out of 22 providers in our speed lab testing, delivering a median of 612 Mbps on a 1 Gbps connection with 25ms latency on nearby servers. That’s a strong result and meaningfully above the industry average, though it trails the top performers — NordVPN, Surfshark, and a few others consistently post higher throughput.
| Metric | CyberGhost | Industry Average |
|---|---|---|
| Median download speed | 612 Mbps | ~480 Mbps |
| Speed lab rank | #10 of 22 | — |
| Latency (nearby server) | 25 ms | ~28 ms |
| Countries | 100 | ~60 |
| Total servers | 11,500+ | ~2,500 |
The 11,500+ server count matters for a reason beyond bragging rights: server-to-user ratio. A VPN with 1,000 servers and 5 million active users has far more congestion risk than one with 11,500 servers. CyberGhost’s network density provides load distribution that translates to more consistent real-world speeds, particularly at peak hours.
The 100-country coverage gives users geographic flexibility that covers almost any use case — streaming region-specific content, connecting through favorable jurisdictions, or simply finding a low-latency server close to a current travel destination. Most competitors stop at 60-75 countries.
On nearby servers (US to US, UK to UK), CyberGhost performed well with speeds consistently above 550 Mbps. On cross-continental connections — US to EU, EU to Asia-Pacific — speeds dropped more than some competitors, typically landing in the 180-320 Mbps range. This is still fast enough for any streaming, video call, or download use case, but users who specifically need high throughput to distant regions should verify with the 45-day guarantee before committing.
Streaming performance is a genuine strength. CyberGhost reliably unblocks:
That’s 7+ services across multiple regional libraries, putting CyberGhost solidly in the top tier for streaming access. The app includes dedicated streaming-optimized servers labeled by the service they’re tuned for — “Netflix US,” “BBC iPlayer UK” — which removes the trial-and-error process most VPN users know well.
This feature design is meaningful. Rather than leaving users to test which server works for which service, CyberGhost pre-configures and labels servers for specific streaming targets. The caveat is that dedicated servers can fall behind when streaming providers update their geo-restriction technology, but CyberGhost’s maintenance of these labeled servers has been consistent.
CyberGhost is aggressively priced at the long end. The monthly rate is $12.99 — comparable to the market average — but the best long-term plan brings it to $2.03/month on a 2-year commitment with 4 bonus months included. That’s among the lowest effective monthly rates for a full-featured VPN.
| Plan Term | Monthly Price | Total Billed | Money-Back |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $12.99/mo | $12.99 | 14 days |
| 6 months | $6.99/mo | $41.94 | 45 days |
| 2 years + 4 months | $2.03/mo | $56.94 | 45 days |
Two things stand out in this table. First, the price floor of $2.03/month is genuinely competitive — it’s below what most rivals charge even on their longest plans. Second, the 45-day money-back guarantee applies to the 6-month and 2-year plans. This is the longest money-back window in the consumer VPN market.
The 14-day window on the monthly plan is shorter and is worth noting for users who want to test the service without committing to a longer term. For meaningful evaluation, the 6-month or 2-year plan — both covered by the 45-day guarantee — is the better test-drive structure.
No other major VPN provider offers 45 days. The industry standard is 30 days (NordVPN, ExpressVPN, Surfshark). CyberGhost’s 45-day window is a concrete statement of confidence in the product, and it has practical value: 45 days is enough time to test streaming access across multiple services, evaluate speed consistency on your actual network, and identify any compatibility issues with specific devices.
Refunds are processed through customer support and are reported to be reliably honored. This is worth verifying independently — but the policy itself is a meaningful differentiator.
At the 2-year rate, a CyberGhost subscription includes:
At this price point, CyberGhost offers a strong value case. The main competitor at a similar price floor is Private Internet Access, which also falls under Kape ownership — a fact worth considering if corporate consolidation is the concern.
CyberGhost includes a feature called Smart Rules that provides automation for VPN connection behavior. This is genuinely useful and underappreciated in most coverage of the product.
Smart Rules lets you configure:
The auto-connect on untrusted Wi-Fi is the most practically valuable setting. It solves the most common failure mode of VPN usage: forgetting to turn it on when it matters. For users who travel or work from shared networks, this automation reduces the friction of consistent VPN use to near zero.
Best fit for:
Not the best fit for:
No review at this standard should gloss over what CyberGhost gets wrong.
1. Kape Technologies ownership. This is the most significant concern. CyberGhost, ExpressVPN, and Private Internet Access are all owned by the same holding company. Kape’s Crossrider history — a software platform associated with adware distribution — is a matter of record. The independent audits, Romanian incorporation, and NoSpy server program are genuine mitigations, but they don’t eliminate the structural concern about a single corporate entity controlling this much VPN infrastructure. Users whose threat model includes the VPN provider itself should take the Kape consolidation seriously.
2. No multi-hop. CyberGhost does not offer a double VPN or multi-hop feature. Routing traffic through two servers in sequence — one in a different country — adds a meaningful layer of protection against traffic analysis. NordVPN and ProtonVPN both offer this. Its absence is a real gap for users with elevated privacy requirements.
3. No Tor integration. CyberGhost has no Onion Over VPN equivalent. For users who want to combine VPN protection with Tor anonymity, NordVPN’s Onion Over VPN or ProtonVPN’s integration are the relevant alternatives.
4. Monthly plan money-back window. The celebrated 45-day guarantee doesn’t apply to the monthly plan, which carries only a 14-day window. This is a meaningful limitation for users who want to test before committing to a longer term — and it’s a detail that marketing materials tend to underemphasize.
5. Speed rank #10. CyberGhost is fast, but not the fastest. For users on gigabit connections who want to maximize throughput, NordVPN or Surfshark post higher numbers in speed lab testing. For virtually all real-world use cases, 612 Mbps is sufficient — but the rank is worth acknowledging.
Is CyberGhost safe after the Kape acquisition?
The honest answer is that CyberGhost’s technical privacy implementation is strong — the Deloitte-audited no-logs policy, WireGuard protocol, Romanian incorporation, and NoSpy servers with owned hardware are all meaningful protections. The Kape ownership is a legitimate concern worth understanding, but it’s structural rather than technical. If your threat model is primarily ISP surveillance, geo-restriction, and public Wi-Fi exposure, CyberGhost’s technical implementation handles those threats well. If your threat model specifically includes your VPN provider or its parent company, Mullvad or ProtonVPN offer cleaner corporate histories.
What makes CyberGhost’s NoSpy servers different from regular servers?
Standard VPN servers are typically colocated in third-party data centers, meaning the data center operator has physical access to the hardware — even if no useful data is stored on it. CyberGhost’s NoSpy servers are physically owned by CyberGhost and housed in its own facility in Romania, managed entirely by CyberGhost employees. This eliminates the third-party data center variable and means any government seeking access would need to pursue CyberGhost directly in Romanian courts, not leverage a colocation provider in a different jurisdiction.
Does CyberGhost work reliably for streaming Netflix?
Yes. CyberGhost’s dedicated streaming servers — labeled by service and region in the app — are maintained specifically for Netflix, Disney+, BBC iPlayer, Hulu, and other major platforms. The dedicated server approach removes most of the guesswork. Occasional service disruptions occur when streaming providers update their VPN detection methods, but CyberGhost’s maintenance cadence on these servers is consistent. The 45-day money-back guarantee provides enough time to verify streaming performance for your specific use case before committing.
How many devices can I use with CyberGhost simultaneously?
CyberGhost allows 7 simultaneous connections per account. This covers most household scenarios — two laptops, two phones, a tablet, a smart TV, and a gaming console would hit exactly 7. Unlike Surfshark, which offers unlimited simultaneous connections, CyberGhost has a hard limit. If you need more than 7 simultaneous connections, you’d need to either install CyberGhost on a router (which counts as one connection for all devices behind it) or consider an alternative provider.
Is the 45-day money-back guarantee genuine?
Yes, with one important caveat: the 45-day guarantee applies to 6-month and 2-year plans, not to the monthly plan (which carries a 14-day window). Refunds on the 45-day plans are processed through customer support and are widely reported to be honored without friction. This guarantee is the longest in the major VPN market and provides a genuine low-risk window to evaluate the service thoroughly before deciding.
Score: 85/100 — Largest network, best guarantee, same Kape question.
CyberGhost’s strongest selling points are concrete and easy to verify. The 11,500+ server network is the largest available. The 45-day money-back guarantee is the longest in the industry. The NoSpy server program — owned hardware in Romania, managed by CyberGhost staff — is a genuine privacy improvement over standard colocation arrangements. WireGuard as the default protocol, quarterly transparency reports, and Deloitte-audited no-logs policy round out a technically solid offering.
The Kape Technologies ownership is a real concern that deserves honest acknowledgment, as it does in our ExpressVPN review. CyberGhost, ExpressVPN, and Private Internet Access under a single holding company is a concentration of VPN infrastructure that’s worth thinking about. The audits and NoSpy program are meaningful mitigations, not dismissals.
If you’re choosing a VPN for streaming, travel, public Wi-Fi protection, and general privacy — and you’re comfortable with the Kape context after understanding it — CyberGhost is a strong, well-supported choice with the most generous evaluation period in the market. If the ownership history is disqualifying, ProtonVPN or Mullvad are the right alternatives. If you want the fastest raw throughput and are less price-sensitive, ExpressVPN or NordVPN lead on speed lab rankings.
For further comparisons, see our best VPN guide and the full VPN comparison table.
Independent speed tests and hands-on reviews for every major VPN.
NordVPN
The VPN trusted by millions
Speed
730 Mbps
Latency
18 ms
View full review →
ProtonVPN
Swiss privacy meets unlimited bandwidth
Speed
580 Mbps
Latency
22 ms
View full review →
Mullvad VPN
Privacy-first VPN with no accounts required
Speed
650 Mbps
Latency
20 ms
View full review →
ExpressVPN
Lightning-fast speeds
Speed
630 Mbps
Latency
22 ms
View full review →
PIA
Open source and transparent
Speed
620 Mbps
Latency
24 ms
View full review →
Surfshark
Unlimited devices
Speed
695 Mbps
Latency
20 ms
View full review →